How To Compose A Good Research Paper Discussion Section
When working on the discussion section of a research paper, you should analyze the topic and offer personal ideas and interpretations concerning the theme of the thesis. It’s necessary both to answer the questions that have been stated in the introduction, and to analyze the effect and contribution of your answers to the existing knowledge on the subject.
The composition of the discussion section is very important. Before you begin working, you should have a complete outline of the text or the issue tree, where all your thoughts will be logically organized. This section of a research paper will defend your answers and prove their value. Here is a list of the most effective methods for writing a good research paper discussion section.
- Start with the specific and end with the general data.
- Apply the same key terms.
- Always restate the hypothesis.
- Use the results to support the ideas.
- State the principles and relationships that have been obtained during the research.
- Explain the value of the paper.
- Describe the possible weaknesses.
- Remain brief and specific.
Your findings in the literature, theory, and practice should be stated in order of most specific to most generalized. First, you should prove the significance of the material in the context of your research, and then describe its general importance.
It’s necessary to use the same terminology throughout the paper to avoid misunderstanding. Create the list of terms that will be used in the text.
Start the section with a restatement of the hypothesis. It should be the starting point of your work. Develop the idea in the context of your research topic.
Apply the results of your research to support the facts that were previously stated in the work. Reference your charts, calculations, and tables for a better explanation, if necessary.
The work should result in the development of a set of principles and relationships between various points of your work. This will prove the results of your work.
State the value of the paper by providing a set of facts. The readers should understand the importance of the work and the consequences of the research.
It’s impossible to write a perfect thesis, and that is why you must state the potential weaknesses of the research process. State the potential flaws but avoid an apologetic tone. It should be a plain statement of facts.
You should be able to give a full description of all the points that have been highlighted in the text, but at the same time you should remain brief and specific.